Habeas Corpus petition was dismissed by a single judge as infructuous on the representation of counsel without substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 684 of 2020
Petitioner :- Rajeev Kumar Yadav And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
Sri Sushil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this writ petition has now become infructuous and therefore, the same may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 17.12.2020 SP
Rajeev Kumar Yadav And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Shamim Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
