Smt. Pooja and Another v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that the writ petition for habeas corpus was not maintainable as the petitioner was legally placed in the custody of the Rajkiya Baalgrih by an order of the Bal Kalyan Samiti. The court directed the petitioners to challenge the Samiti's order under Section 101 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015.
What did the court decide?
The Writ Petition is disposed of.