In this habeas corpus writ petition, the High Court held that the proceeding has become infructuous and dismissed the petition accordingly. The order is a short disposal with no substantive discussion.
Petition dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 457 of 2020
Petitioner :- Smt Sarita And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gaurav Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,J. Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
Sri Gaurav Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Amit Sinha, learned AGA for the State-respondents.
Counsel for the petitioners submits that this petition has become infructuous.
The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 23.11.2020 RK
Smt Sarita And Another
State Of U.P.
Pritinker Diwaker
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
