Dismissed

Deeksha Singh (Corpus) v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC9 Sept 2020HABC/361/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court examined a habeas corpus petition seeking the release of a detained petitioner, Deeksha Singh. Upon recording her statement confirming she married Anurag Singh Raghuvanshi, resides with him, and wishes to return to her parents, the Court found no grounds to make the rule absolute. The petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was directed to deposit Rs. 10,000 to her father.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; petitioner (Divyanshu Singh) directed to deposit Rs. 10,000 in account of petitioner's father (Deeksha Singh), recoverable by Collector Jaunpur.

Deeksha Singh (Corpus) Vs State of U.P. and… — Child Custody and Guardianship | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 66

¶2

Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 361 of 2020

¶3

Petitioner :- Deeksha Singh (Corpus) Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prakash Chandra Pathak,Rama Shankar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Adarsh Bhushan,Vineet Kumar Singh

¶4

Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.

¶5

Sri Vineet Kumar Singh, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no.3, which is taken on record.

¶6

Heard Sri Rama Shankar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Indrajeet Singh, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondent nos.1, 2 and 4 and Sri Vineet Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.3.

¶7

In compliance with rule nisi issued by this Court on 03.09.2020, the detenue Smt. Deeksha Singh, has been produced before this Court by Sub-Inspector, Sarita Yadav (P.N.O. No.162384185) posted at P. S. Line Bazar, District Jaunpur, who has identified the detenue before this Court. This Court proceeds to record her stand in the matter, verbatim:

¶8

"Q.1. Aapka naam?

¶9

Ans. Deeksha Singh

¶10

Q.2. Aapke pitaji ka naam?

¶11

Ans. Ramnarayan Singh

¶12

Q.3. Aapki aayu?

¶13

Ans. 22 Varsh

¶14

Q.4. Kya aapne shadi ki hai?

¶15

Ans. Ji Sir

¶16

Q.5. Kisse ki hai?

¶17

Ans. Anurag Singh Raghuvanshi se

¶18

Q. 6. Divyanshu Singh kaun hain?

¶19

Ans. Ghar ke bagal ka hai

¶20

Q. 7. Divyanshu se shadi nahi ki hai?

¶21

Ans. Nahi Q. 8. Kiske pas rahti hain? Ans. Apne Sasural Q. 9. Sasural se matlab? Ans. Husband ke pas Q. 10. Kaha jana chahti hain?

¶22

Ans. Mummi Papa ke pas

¶23

Considering the aforesaid statement of the detenue, Smt. Deeksha Singh, it is clear that she has not married Divyanshu Singh. She has married Anurag Singh Raghuvanshi. She also said that she lives with her in-laws and wants to go back with her parents.

¶24

Accordingly, this Court does not find any good ground to make the rule absolute. The rule is, therefore, discharged.

¶25

In the result, this writ petition stands dismissed .

¶26

The petitioner (Divyanshu Singh) is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- in account of Sri Ramnarayan Singh, father of the detenue, Smt. Deeksha Singh, payable at Jaunpur through a bank instrument within a period of one month. In case, the aforesaid sum of money is not deposited by the petitioner (Divyanshu Singh) as directed above, the Collector, Jaunpur is ordered to recover the said sum of money as arrears of land revenue and deposit the sum in account of Sri Ramnarayan Singh as soon as it is realized.

¶27

Let this order be communicated to the Collector, District - Jaunpur by the Joint Registrar (Compliance).

¶28

Order Date :- 9.9.2020 Atul

Deeksha Singh (Corpus) v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deeksha Singh (Corpus) v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Aamil Vs State of U.P.

Parul Sharma @ Parul Tomar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sapna Vishwakarma Vs State of U.P. and Another

Aparna Tripathi Now Aparna Jain (Corpus) Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Km. Anjana Gautam and Another Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Sangeeta and Another Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others