In a habeas corpus petition, the petitioner's counsel was absent. The respondent filed an affidavit denying that the petitioners worked at the relevant brick kiln, supported by other labourers. The court dismissed the petition as lacking merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 52
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 24 of 2020
Petitioner :- Ajad And 7 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manish Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
List has been revised. Learned counsel for the petitioners is not present.
Learned AGA has filed affidavit in compliance of order dated 10.01.2020, which is taken on record.
As per affidavit, petitioners-corpus in question have never worked at brick klin of respondent nos. 5 and 6. Along with affidavit, statement of other labourers are also annexed supporting the content of affidavit.
Accordingly, petition lacks merit and is dismissed.
Order Date :- 27.1.2020 Arvind
Ajad And 7 Others
State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Neeraj Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
