As far as cross objections filed by the claimants are concerned, claimants have submitted that learned Claims Tribunal had erred in deducting Rs. 1470/- on account of House Rent Allowance whereas House Rent Allowance could have been deducted from the salary of the deceased and but not such allowances like nutritious allowance, washing allowance, city allowance and cycle allowance could have been deducted and total comes to be Rs. 1190/-. Therefore, from total salary of Rs. 24,728/- when Rs. 1990/- is deducted then net income of the deceased comes out to the tune of Rs. 23,538/-. As the amount spent by the deceased on self when deducted then net disposable income available to the claimants will come to Rs. 15692/- per month or Rs. 1,88,304/- per annum. When multiplier of 15 is applied then total compensation comes out to Rs. 28,24,560/- in place of Rs. 26,02,005 calculated by the learned Claims Tribunal. It is also submitted that when 50% is added towards future prospects then total compensation under the pecuniary head will come to Rs. 42,36,840/-. Over and above, this claimants will be entitled to a sum of Rs. 70,000/- under non-pecuniary head in terms of the law laid down by Supreme Court in case of National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi and others as reported in (2017) 16 Supreme Court Cases 680. Thus cross objections are allowed. Claimants award amount is enhanced to Rs. 43,06,840/- and the amount shall also carry interest at the rate of 7% as has been awarded by the learned Claims Tribunal. It is further directed that out of this amount of Rs. 43,06,840/-, Rs.
