This order declares a criminal miscellaneous writ petition infructuous because a charge sheet has been filed in the underlying FIR, and dismisses the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9811 of 2020
Petitioner :- Priyanka Chaurasiya And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Pal,Kamlakar Pal Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Sujeet Kumar
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Heard Sri R. K. Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Sri Sushil Kumar Pal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms Chaya Gupta, Advocate appearing for respondent no. 4 and learned AGA for the State.
It is contended by learned counsel for the informant/respondent no. 4 that charge sheet has already been filed pursuant to the impugned FIR and, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. Copy of the charge sheet has been filed today, which is taken on record. Copy of the charge sheet has also been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner.
In this view of the matter, the writ petition has become infructuous and is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 7.10.2020 RavindraKSingh
Priyanka Chaurasiya And 4 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
B. Amit Sthalekar, J.
Shekhar Kumar Yadav, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
