The High Court found that a charge-sheet had been submitted against the petitioner, rendering this criminal miscellaneous writ petition infructuous at that stage. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8649 of 2020
Petitioner :- Pradeep Singh Nirwan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neetu Dwivedi,Vinod Prakash Srivastava (Senior Adv.)
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
We are informed by Sri Deepak Mishra, the learned AGA that a charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner on 21.10.2020, copy of which is also handed over to Sri Prashant Vyas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
If that be so, there is no good ground to continue to hear this petition at this stage.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 3.11.2020 Chandra
Pradeep Singh Nirwan
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Pankaj Naqvi
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
