The Hon'ble Court dismissed the Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition for want of prosecution after the learned counsel for the parties were absent.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 52
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6788 of 2000
Petitioner :- Vindhyachal Tiwari Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.K. Roy Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,A.K. Mishra
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
Case has been called out in revised list. Learned counsel for both the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 are not present. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 20.1.2020 Rmk.
Vindhyachal Tiwari
State of U.P.
Neeraj Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
