Petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition. Bench noted insufficient facts regarding non-completion of investigation. Petition was dismissed with observation that investigation must conclude earliest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6615 of 2020
Petitioner :- Smt. Stuti Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anirudha Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
In none of the paragraphs of the writ petition, the petitioner states that the police has not completed the investigation.
In absence of disclosure of complete facts, no direction can be issued by this Court at the instance of the petitioner. We, however, expect that the Investigating Officer would conclude the investigation at the earliest.
Subject to the above, the writ petition is dismissed .
Order Date :- 6.7.2020 P Kesari
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to issue any direction given the absence of a stated finding that police has not completed the investigation?
Smt. Stuti Tripathi
State Of U.P.
Sunita Agarwal
Ajit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
