Mohd Afzal and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court refused to quash the FIR against petitioner no.1 due to prima facie maintenance. However, it granted interim protection against arrest for petitioners no.2 to 6 until the submission of the police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C., ordering cooperation with investigation. The petition for quashing by petitioner no.1 was dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Non-arrest of petitioners no.2 to 6 until submission of police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C.; no protection for petitioner no.1.