The High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR, holding that serious allegations precluded interference at the initial stage as it might impede speedy investigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5302 of 2020
Petitioner :- Liyakat And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamal Kishor Mishra,Mohammad Ali Ausaf Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 15.6.2020 Abhilash
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal miscellaneous writ petition for quashing of the FIR is a fit case for judicial intervention under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Liyakat And 3 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Sunita Agarwal
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
