Vipin Yadav @ Vipin Kumar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-judge court held that since police investigation exonerated the petitioner, the criminal miscellaneous writ petition for quashing FIR is disposed of.
Single-judge court held that since police investigation exonerated the petitioner, the criminal miscellaneous writ petition for quashing FIR is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3909 of 2020
Petitioner :- Vipin Yadav @ Vipin Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deepak Kumar Verma,Akansha Verma,Siya Ram Verma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Ravi Nath Tilhari,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.
The instant petition has been filed praying for quashing of the FIR dated 19.09.2017 registered as Case Crime No. 1049 of 2017, under Sections 147, 120-B, 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 I.P.C. Police Station-Simbhawali, District-Hapur.
Learned A.G.A. on instructions states that the police after investigation has exonerated Vipin Yadav whereas investigation against some other accused persons is still in progress.
In view of his statement nothing further survives in the instant petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 14.12.2020
SY
(Ravi Nath Tilhari, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.)
Vipin Yadav @ Vipin Kumar
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Ravi Nath Tilhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court