Ajit Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16787 of 2019
Petitioner :- Ajit Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudarshan Prasad,Shiv Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Karunesh Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
There is already a notice that in case the either side is not present, necessary orders shall be passed.
Case called out, no one responds on behalf of the petitioners.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any stands vacated.
Office to proceed.
Order Date :- 17.12.2020 Chandra
Ajit Kumar Singh
State Of U.P.
Pankaj Naqvi
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court