In Crl. Misc. W.P. No. 1580 of 2020, the High Court relied on an affidavit of compliance filed by the Additional General Advocate. Stating that the girl had been recovered and the accused arrested, the court held that the prayers in the writ petition were satisfied and dismissed the petition as no further cause of action survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 29
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1580 of 2020
Petitioner :- Neelam Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Yadav,Bhaiya Lal Yadav
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
Learned A.G.A. has received instructions and he has prepared an affidavit of compliance in pursuance of the order dated 10.2.2020. Affidavit of compliance is directed to be kept on record.
According to the aforesaid affidavit, the girl has been recovered and the accused person has been arrested.
In view of the above, the prayers made in the writ petition stands satisfied and accordingly, we are of the opinion that no further cause of action survives in the writ petition and the same stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 17.2.2020 Mini
Neelam Singh
State Of U.P.
Pankaj Mithal
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
