Arvind Singh and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10416 of 2020
Petitioner :- Arvind Singh And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
Sri Pradeep Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioners states that writ petition has become infructuous and it be dismissed as such.
Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 2.11.2020 Vikram/-
Arvind Singh And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Pankaj Naqvi
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court