The criminal miscellaneous writ petition filed by the petitioners was dismissed as it had been filed as withdrawn by the counsel for the petitioners. No substantive legal proposition was laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10385 of 2020
Petitioner :- Saddam Khan And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
After the matter was heard at length, Sri Amit Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners has come up with the request that he proposes to apply for bail before the court below, writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 15.12.2020 Ashutosh
Digitally signed by Justice Pankaj Digitally signed by Justice Vivek Naqvi Agarwal Date: 2020.12.16 16:10:00 IST Date: 2020.12.16 16:14:01 IST Reason: Document Owner Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Allahabad
Saddam Khan
State Of U.P.
Pankaj Naqvi
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
