In this contempt application, the court dismissed the petition because the alleged contemptuous act occurred after the period of interim protection granted by the writ court had expired, leaving the applicant to seek other remedies.
Application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 65
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4944 of 2020
Applicant :- Surya Narayan Singh Yadav Opposite Party :- Sri Mangala Prasad Singh D.M. And 6 Others
Counsel for Applicant :- Pramod Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 18.12.2020 Pr/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a contempt action is maintainable when the alleged act occurred after the expiry of the interim relief period granted by a writ court.
Surya Narayan Singh Yadav
Sri Mangala Prasad Singh
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
