This is a very short contempt application where the court dismissed the matter as infructuous because the electricity supply had been restored, removing the cause for the application.
Application dismissed as infructuous; notice discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 71
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4093 of 2020
Applicant :- Rajendra Kumar Opposite Party :- Jhabbu Ram, Executive Engineer Vidyut Vitram Khand And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Vikram Yadav,Sunil Kumar Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Baleshwar Chaturvedi
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the contestingrespondent on the basis of instructions apprised to the Court that the electricity supply of the applicant has been restored and as such, the cause for filing of the present contempt application no more survives and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. The same has been acknowledged by learned counsel for the applicant.
Consequently, the present contempt application stands disposed of in terms of the aforesaid. Notice, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 1.12.2020 A.K.Srivastava
Rajendra Kumar
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
