In a contempt application regarding compliance with a writ order, the single judge recorded satisfaction of substantial compliance by the opposite party and disposed of the matter without interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 71
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3702 of 2016
Applicant :- Naval Kishore Sharma Opposite Party :- Smt Manisha Gupta Chairman Nagar Palika Parishad Mathura Counsel for Applicant :- Ajeet Kumar Singh,Abhishek Singh
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
On the matter being taken up today, Shri Saurabh Tiwar, learned counsel for the opposite has pressed the affidavit of compliance dated 16.10.2016 and submits that in response to the writ court order dated 03.03.2016, the claim of the applicant has been decided by the opposite party vide order dated 15.10.2016 and as such necessary steps have been taken for honouring the writ court order.
The Court has proceeded to peruse the record in question and finds that substantial compliance has been ensured in the matter and as such, no interference is required in the matter.
In view of the above, nothing further survives in the contempt application and the same stands disposed of . Notices, if any, stand discharged.
Order Date :- 22.10.2020 A. Pandey
Naval Kishore Sharma
Smt Manisha Gupta
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
