Allowed

Udham Singh @ Dabbu Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC5 Mar 2020BAIL/9561/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Misc. Bail Application allowed. Court granted bail to applicant under U.P. Gangster Act subject to personal bond, two sureties, and standard conditions of not tampering with evidence and attending court.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail in Case Crime No.82 of 2019 upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court.

Udham Singh @ Dabbu Singh Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 79 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9561 of 2020 Applicant :- Udham Singh @ Dabbu Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Umesh Kumar,Bhawesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Harsh Kumar,J.

¶3

Heard Sri Bhawesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶4

Learned counsel for applicant contended that there are two cases shown in the gang chart against applicant, and in both cases applicant is on bail, the bail orders are filed at Annexure nos.3 and 4 to the affidavit; that applicant has no criminal history; that applicant undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty of bail; that applicant is in custody since 25.4.2019.

¶5

Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer of bail.

¶6

Upon hearing learned counsel and perusal of record and considering the complicity of accused, severity of punishment as well as totality of facts and circumstances, at this stage without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.

¶7

Let the applicant Udham Singh @ Dabbu Singh be released on bail in Case Crime No.82 of 2019, under Sections 3(1) U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Kachhawan, District Mirzapur on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

¶8

(i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in any manner whatsoever.

¶9

(ii) The applicant will abide the orders of court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.

¶10

(iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities.

¶11

(iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.

¶12

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison. Order Date :- 5.3.2020 Tamang

Udham Singh @ Dabbu Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Udham Singh @ Dabbu Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jafer Ali Vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Mahendri Devi and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Allu @ Sharafat Vs State of U.P.

Sayara Vs State of U.P.

Arjendra Singh Vs State of U.P.

Kasif Vs State of U.P.