Allowed

Sukhendra Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC10 Jun 2020BAIL/6243/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed bail application filed by Sukhendra Singh under cheating and forgery charges. Bail was granted primarily on grounds of parity as the identically placed co-accused had already been released without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Accused released on bail upon furnishing personal bond and two sureties subject to specific conditions including no interference with evidence and sincere cooperation in trial.

Sukhendra Singh Vs State of U.P. — Money Laundering | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 70

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6243 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Sukhendra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Kumar Kushwaha,Rabindra Bahadur Singh

¶4

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

¶7

The co-accused, Kiran Shukla, has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 10.01.2020 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1004 of 2020. The prayer for release of the applicant on bail on the ground of parity has been made. The applicant is languishing in jail since 21.09.2019.

¶8

Considering the fact that the identically placed coaccused has already been released on bail by this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that it is a fit case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶9

Let the applicant, Sukhendra Singh , involved in case crime No. 92 of 2019, under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C, and section 66- D I.T. Act Police Station Peelkhana, District Kanpur Nagar be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶10

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶11

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶12

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶13

In case the applicant has been enlarged on short term bail as per the order of committee

¶14

constituted under the orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court his bail shall be effective after the period of short term bail comes to an end.

¶15

The applicant shall be enlarged on bail on execution of personal bond without sureties till normal functioning of the courts is restored. The accused will furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the court below within a month after normal functioning of the courts are restored.

¶16

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶17

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶19

Order Date :- 10.6.2020 Atul kr. sri.

Sukhendra Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sukhendra Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Goel Vs State of U.P.

Shashi Mohan Vs State of U.P.

Farid Vs State of U.P.

Pankaj Sharma Vs State of U.P.

Sumant Shobhari Alias Sonu Sharma Vs State of U.P.

Arvind Kesharwani Alias Manju Vs State of U.P.