Aneeta v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court allowed bail to applicant Aneeta in a Narcotic Drugs case by imposing personal bond and two sureties, subject to specific attendance conditions and a one-month period to produce sureties due to the COVID-19 lockdown.
What did the court decide?
Release on bail subject to personal bond, two sureties within one month, and specific conditions of appearance.
What the court decided
In Chamber
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 57553 of 2019
Applicant :- Aneeta Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Jawahir Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
- Counter affidavit filed by the State. Taken on record.
- The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant - Aneeta with a prayer to release her on bail in Case Crime No. -1060 of 2019, under Section -8/21 N.D.P.S. Act, Police Station -Loni, District -Ghaziabad , during pendency of trial.
- Perused the bail application and the affidavit filed in support thereof.
- From perusal of the application and the affidavit filed in support thereof, it appears, at present:
(i) the applicant is accused of offence under Section -8/21 N.D.P.S. Act;
(ii) against FIR lodged on 07.11.2019, the applicant is in confinement since then;
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant Aneeta should be released on bail in a case under Sections 8/21 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
What conditions should be imposed on the applicant regarding attendance in court and filing computer-generated orders.
Whether the applicant can be released on a personal bond pending furnishing of sureties due to the national lockdown.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Aneeta
Coram
Saumitra Dayal Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/57553/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court