Allowed

Sudarshan Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC10 Dec 2020BAIL/45508/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to the applicant charged under the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, allowing his release during trial on furnishing security and adhering to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount, subject to conditions of cooperation and non-interference.

Sudarshan Singh Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 76

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45508 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Sudarshan Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Durga Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶6

By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in Case Crime No.203 of 2020, under section 2/3 Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Jaria, district Hamirpur and is in jail since 12.10.2020, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.

¶7

An first information report dated 15.09.2020 was lodged under Section 2/3 Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 alleging that the applicant alongwith others formed a gang and have committed various offences.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has been implicated in the present case on the basis of his involvement in one other criminal case mentioned in gang chart, copy whereof has been annexed on page no.15 of the affidavit accompanying this bail application. He next submitted that the applicant has been granted bail in the criminal case shown against him in the gang chart. Copy of the bail order has been annexed on page no.17 onwards of the affidavit accompanying this application, hence the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶9

The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A. However he does not dispute the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in the case mentioned against him in the gang chart.

¶10

Keeping in view, the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail during the pendency of the trial.

¶11

Let the applicant Sudarshan Singh involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶13

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶14

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶15

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the

¶16

sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶17

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶18

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by learned counsel for the applicant along with a self attested identity proof of the said persons (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number (s) to which the said Aadhar Card is linked before the concerned Court/Authority/Official.

¶19

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶20

Order Date :- 10.12.2020 R./

Sudarshan Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudarshan Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Premlata and Anr. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Chaman Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Rakesh Vs State of U.P.

Neksu Vs State of U.P.

Bharat Vs State of U.P.

Sanjay Kushwaha @ Shyam Karan Vs State of U.P.