Allowed

Danish v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC16 Dec 2020BAIL/44348/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted bail to the accused applicant Danish in a case involving cow slaughter under the Cow Slaughter Act, allowing release on bond and surety with conditions to avoid criminal activity, tampering with evidence, or pressuring witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties with conditions to abstain from criminal activity, tamper evidence, pressurize witnesses, and appear before the trial court.

Danish Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 91

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44348 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Danish Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Zakir Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Subhash Chand,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for applicant(s), learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶6

This bail application has been preferred by the accusedapplicant(s) Danish who is involved in Case Crime No.118 of 2020 under Section 3/5/8 Cow Slaughter Act, P.S.Gulsothi, District- Bulandshahr.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his prayer for bail submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that co-accused Nawab having similar role to that of applicant has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 9.9.2020 therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. The applicant has has no previous criminal history,he is not likely to abscond.

¶8

On behalf of State bail has been opposed but learned A.G.A. conceded on the point of parity.

¶9

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by learned counsel for both sides and going through the record, without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.

¶10

Let applicant(s) Danish be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶11

(i) The applicant(s) shall not indulge in any criminal activity.

¶12

(ii) The applicant(s) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.

¶13

(iii) The applicant(s) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.

¶14

(iv) The applicant(s) shall regularly appear on the dates fixed by

¶15

the trial court unless his personal attendance is exempted by the trial court.

¶16

In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, liberty is given to the trial court to cancel the bail of the applicant(s) without any reference to this Court.

¶17

Order Date :- 16.12.2020 SKS

Danish v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Danish v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Devesh Pratap Singh Vs State of U.P.

Ramji Tiwari Vs State of U.P.

Vijay Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Sanju and Another Vs State of U.P.

Shanu Vs State of U.P.

Subash Lohar Vs State of U.P.