Shane Alam v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge granted anticipatory bail to the applicant in a criminal case involving multiple IPC sections. The order was based on parity with co-accused who were already released.
What did the court decide?
Release of the applicant on personal bond and two sureties subject to specific conditions including parity with co-accused bail.
What the court decided
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 42703 of 2020
Applicant :- Shane Alam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Irshad Ahmad,Mohd Faiz Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Order on Criminal Misc. Exemption Application
This exemption application is allowed.
Order on Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Shane Alam with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 90 of 2020 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 188, 269, 336, 270, 332, 353, 307, 504, 427, 506/34, 323/324 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 Lok Sampatti Nuksan Nivaran Adhiniyam and Section 7 of Criminal Law (Amendment) Act and Section 51 Aapda Prabandhan Adhiniyam and Section 3 Mahamari Adhiniyam, Police Station- Nagphani, District- Moradabad during pendency of trial.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail on the ground of parity with co-accused granted bail by this Court.
Whether the conditions for granting bail in the context of pendency of trial during the pandemic are appropriate.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shane Alam
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/42703/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court