This application for bail under the U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986 was heard. The court granted bail subject to specific conditions, relying on the Supreme Court judgment in Dataram Singh.
Bail granted to the applicant subject to conditions including weekly court appearance and restriction on leaving the country.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40405 of 2020
Applicant :- Angad Yadav @ Lala Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Jagadish Prasad Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd vaxn ;kno mQZ ykyk ;kno dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 110 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 3(1) U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986, Fkkuk dU/kkjiqj] ftyk vktex<+ esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,o a fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa jaft’ku >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosnd ds fo:) xSax pkVZ esa nf’kZr fd, x, oknksa esa mldh tekur gks pqdh gS Li"Vhdj.k 'kiFki= esa fn;k x;k gS] vkosnd fdlh xSax dk yhMj ;k lnL; ugha gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 15&9&2020 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;] tekur ij eqDr gksus ds i’pkr~ vkosnd Qjkj ugha gksxk vkSj u gh vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa dks izHkkfor djsxkA
fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds tekur dk fojks/k fd;kA
i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa] Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 21 ,oa Dataram Singh
Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 ds izdj.k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr vH;qfDr ds n`f"Vxr] okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa mlh /kujkf’k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A
7& lacaf/kr U;k;ky;@izkf/kdj.k@vf/kdkjh] mPp U;k;ky; bykgkckn dh vkf/kdkfjd osclkbV ls vkns’k dh ,slh dEI;wVjhd`r izfr dh lR;rk dh iqf"V djsxk vkSj fyf[kr :i ls bl rjg ds lR;kiu dh ?kks"k.k djsxkA
mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ;g tekur jn~n djus dk vk/kkj gksxkA
fn0 % 25&11&2020 ds0lh0flag
2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail can be granted to the applicant in the trial of anoffence under the U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986.
Whether the constitutional right under Article 21 mandates that bail must be granted under specific conditions in gangster cases.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and anotherExplained¶9
Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, (2018) 3 SCC 22 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Angad Yadav @ Lala Yadav
State of U.P.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
