Hori @ Hori Lal v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
In an incomplete bail application where the type copy of the FIR differed from the certified copy, the court dismissed the matter without engaging with the substantive plea.
In an incomplete bail application where the type copy of the FIR differed from the certified copy, the court dismissed the matter without engaging with the substantive plea.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 16
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4003 of 2020
Applicant :- Hori @ Hori Lal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sharda Prasad Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Preet Pal Singh Rathore
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Vakalatnama filed by Sri Preetpal Singh Rathore on behalf of the first informant is taken on record.
Heard Sri Sharda Prasad Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Preetpal Singh Rathore, learned counsel for the first informant and the learned A.G.A.
The type copy of the F.I.R is incomplete and in variance with the certified copy of the same. The present bail application is dismissed at this stage.
Order Date :- 10.2.2020 AS Rathor
(Samit Gopal,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted when the FIR copy is incomplete and inconsistent with the certified copy
Hori @ Hori Lal
State of U.P.
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court