Allowed

Izhaar Ahmed Sabari @ Rumi v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC24 Nov 2020BAIL/38651/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to the applicant in a case under the U.P. Gangster Act by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, relying on Article 21 and a Supreme Court dictum, without expressing an opinion on the case merits.

What did the court decide?

The applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to specified conditions.

Izhaar Ahmed Sabari @ Rumi Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 91

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38651 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Izhaar Ahmed Sabari @ Rumi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- A.C.Tiwari(Ac) Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material brought on record.

¶6

The present bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Izhaar Ahmed Sabari @ Rumi , with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 599 of 2018, under Section 2/3(1) U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Kareilly, DistrictPrayagraj, during pendency of trial.

¶7

The submission advanced by learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that three cases have been shown in the gang chart against the applicant wherein the dispute has been settled between the parties in all three cases, hence the entire proceeding of Case Crime No. 276 of 2018 has been quashed and in other two cases i.e. Case Crime Nos. 352/2017 and 353/2017, proceedings have been stayed by this Hon'ble Court. Submission is that the applicant is not a gangster and has never acted or conducted himself as such. Counsel for the applicant has also tried to justify the alleged previous offences which are said to have been committed by the applicant. Further submission is that co-accused, Afsar Ahmad Shabri @ Javed, has been granted bail by coordinate Bench of this Court. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the Court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 21.7.2020.

¶8

Learned AGA for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

¶9

Having considered the material on record, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another , reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant, involved

¶10

in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶11

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶12

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶13

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶14

In case the applicant has been enlarged on short term bail as per the order of committee constituted under the orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court his/her bail shall be effective after the period of short-term bail comes to an end.

¶15

The applicant shall be enlarged on bail on execution of personal bond without sureties till normal functioning of the courts is restored. The accused will furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the court below within a month after normal functioning of the courts are restored.

¶16

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶17

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶19

Order Date :- 24.11.2020

¶20

Vandana

Izhaar Ahmed Sabari @ Rumi v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Izhaar Ahmed Sabari @ Rumi v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satyabhan Vs State of U.P.

Sanjeed Vs State of U.P.

Nadeem Ansari Vs Narcotics Control Bureau and Another

Gyan Singh Gihar Vs State of U.P.

Akhilesh Lodhi Vs State of U.P.

Anuj Yadav Vs State of U.P.