Dileep v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order grants anticipatory bail to Dileep, an applicant detained since August 25, 2020, based on parity with a co-accused released on November 3, 2020, without deciding the merits of the case.
What did the court decide?
Bail allowed on personal bond and two sureties; applicant to file certified copy of order on court website.
What the court decided
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38616 of 2020
Applicant :- Dileep Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Hari Narayan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.
The co-accused, Kamlesh Nishad @ Kalle, has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 3.11.2020 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.37080 of 2020. The prayer for release of the applicant on bail on the ground of parity has been made. The applicant is languishing in jail since 25.08.2020.
Considering the fact that the identically placed coaccused has already been released on bail by this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that it is a fit case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant, Dileep, involved in case crime No.684 of 2020, under sections 379,411, 413, 120B I.P.C, Police Station Pipraich, District Gorakhpur be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
- The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail on the ground of parity with a co-accused already released.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Dileep
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/38616/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court