Allowed

Vineet Shukla v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC9 Nov 2020BAIL/38327/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application allowed to the applicant falsely implicated in theft. Conditions including personal bond, verification of the order via High Court website, and non-interference with witnesses are imposed, accounting for pandemic restrictions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail conditions including a personal bond (two sureties deferred until normal court functioning), non-tampering with evidence, and cooperation in trial.

Vineet Shukla Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 70

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38327 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Vineet Shukla Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

¶7

There is allegation of theft of Tullu pump against unknown accused persons in the First Information Report.Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that applicant was not named in the First Information Report.He has been falsely implicated. Although recovery has been shown from him but there is no public witness of the recovery.The applicant is in jail since 16.8.2020. The criminal history of one case of the applicant has been explained in paragraph-11 of the affidavit filed in support of the application.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the aforesaid fact..

¶9

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, argument advanced on behalf of the parties, spreading of novel corona virus in jails, evidence on record regarding complicity of the accused, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018)3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant, Vineet Shukla, who is involved in Case Crime No. 172 of 2020, under Sections 379, 411, 413 I.P.C, Police Station-Brijmanganj , DistrictMaharajganj, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like

¶11

amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶12

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶13

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶14

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶15

In case the applicant has been enlarged on short term bail as per the order of committee constituted under the orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court his bail shall be effective after the period of short term bail comes to an end.

¶16

The applicant shall be enlarged on bail on execution of personal bond without sureties till normal functioning of the courts is restored. The accused will furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the court below within a month after normal functioning of the courts are restored. In case court below is functioning normally, this condition will not apply and applicant shall be enlarged on bail on execution of bail bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court below.

¶17

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶18

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶19

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶20

Order Date :- 9.11.2020 Atul kr. sri.

Vineet Shukla v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vineet Shukla v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Vs State of U.P.

Anuj Vs State of U.P.

Azmullah @ Anmullah Siddiqui Vs State of U.P.

Jasharat Vs State of U.P.

Shivam Dohrey Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Sita Shree Vs State of U.P.