Allowed

Shilendra v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC23 Jan 2020BAIL/3808/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to the applicant, Shilendra, in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The order imposes strict conditions regarding court attendance, prohibition of adjournments, and consequences for non-appearance or misuse of bail.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with execution of personal bond, two sureties, and strict conditions prohibiting adjournments and ensuring presence on fixed trial dates.

Shilendra Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 54

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3808 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Shilendra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Manoj Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that one case has been shown against the applicant in the Gang Chart which has been annexed as Annexure No. 2 to the affidavit filed in support of the bail application and in the said case, the applicant has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 9.1.2020 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application 1320 of 2020, the said fact has been mentioned in para no. 6 to the affidavit filed in support of bail application. The applicant is in jail since 6.10.2019

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Keeping in view the nature of submissions advanced and the provisions for initiation of cases and release of the accused in U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986 evidence complicity of the accused severity of punishment and reformative theory of punishment without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.

¶9

Let the applicant- Shilendra involved in Case Crime No. 270 of 2019 under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station-Pilua, District Etah be enlarged on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following condition:-

¶10

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of

¶11

this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶12

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶16

Order Date :- 23.1.2020 Akbar

Shilendra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shilendra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Adalati Nishad Vs State of U.P. and Another

Satyendra Yadav @ Halkutta Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Pappu Nishad Vs State of U.P. and Another

Atul Vs State of U.P.

Faijal Khan Alias Sonu Vs State of U.P.

Furkaan Vs State of U.P.