It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that it is true that the marriage of applicant was solemnized with Sandhya Gautam on 26.04.2008 and from their wedlock a girl now aged about 8 years namely, Drishya Gautam was borne. Much emphasis has been given by contending that in fact Smt. Sandhya Gautam was suffering with serious ailments related to heart and applicant ensured her proper medical care and treatment at various hospitals, but due to complications developed, as a result of her ailment, Sandhya Gautam was not able to conceive the child, therefore, she under the depression left her matrimonial house and started living with her parents. Several efforts was made by the applicant to bring back Smt. Sandhya Gautam, but she did not come back. Thereafter, it was agreed between the applicant and Sandhya Gautam that applicant will solemnize other marriage in order to extend his linage, to which Smt. Sandhya Gautam has no objection. It is next submitted that in the aforesaid background as per terms agreed, applicant solemnized his marriage with the first informant aged about 35 years. It is next submitted that it is wrong to say that first informant was not aware about the existence of earlier marriage of the applicant. It is next submitted that Smt. Sandhya Gautam in collusion with first informant lodged FIR as case crime no. 254 of 2019 under Sections 498A, 494, 420 IPC, Police Station Jasrana, District Firozabad. On 16.09.2019 applicant filed a Case No. 687 of 2019 under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act and also filed Case No. 635 of 2019 under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act on 04.10.2011. Copy whereof have been brought on record as Annexure Nos. 8, 9 and 10 respectively to the bail application. Lastly, it is submitted that it is admitted case of the prosecution that on 01.07.2019 victim had gained knowledge about the first marriage of the applicant, even then she kept silent for a period almost a year and made physical relation with the applicant. The impugned FIR has been lodged after one year and fifteen days only with a view to harass and extract the money from the applicant. It is also submitted that from the perusal of statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. of the victim, it is clear that even after gaining knowledge about the first marriage of applicant on 01.07.2019, there was physical relations between the applicant and victim. It is also pointed out that the applicant in paragraph
