Learned counsel for applicant contends that applicant has been falsely implicated being father-in-law of deceased; that as per averments made in F.I.R. lodged by Ramnath Gupta his daughter Nipun was married to applicant's son Pintu Gupta and Gawna had taken place on 06.05.2009, whereafter three children born out of the wedlock and as per averments made in F.I.R. applicant and his son used to torture the deceased for bringing insufficient money, while her mother-in-law used to check them and on 05.05.2019 at about 09:30 am son-in-law of first informant made a mobile call informing death of Nipun on account of falling on ground and when first informant reached at the matrimonial house of his son-in-law, and Samdhi were missing from there and even children of her daughter were not present and persons informed him that funeral of deceased was performed during night, which indicates that death of his daughter was committed by son-in-law and Samdhi of first informant who in order to make her disappear burned her body and fled away; that F.I.R. has been lodged after inordinate delay of three days upon investigation of some other persons that there is not even single complaint in 10 years after Gawna and it is absolutely wrong to say that applicant ever made any demand of dowry and the allegations about torturing the deceased for bringing insufficient dowry are totally vague and concocted; that witnesses Barsati Ansair and Govind Gupta are not binding on applicant; that even according to statement of above persons, Pintu the husband of deceased used to admonishing her saying that he will kill her at any day; that case of applicant is distinguishable from co-accused Pintu the husband of deceased; that applicant had no motive to cause death of his daughter-in-law; that applicant has no criminal
