Allowed

Rahul Mishra v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC10 Nov 2020BAIL/33000/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the applicant pending trial under Sections 14(2), 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 of the Foreigners Act and Section 120-B IPC. The High Court emphasized the applicant's fault-free conduct, voluntary confession, and non-harmful nature of the offense while relying on the guidelines from Dharam Singh.

What did the court decide?

Permission to be on bail granted to the applicant on fixed terms including submission of bond papers and compliance with High Court orders.

Rahul Mishra Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 91

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33000 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Rahul Mishra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Bharat Bhushan Paul,Saurabh Paul Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd jkgqy feJk dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 510 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 3] 4] 5] 6] 7] 8 I.T.P. and 14(2, 3, 4, 5) Foreign Act and 120-B I.P.C.] Fkkuk rktxat] ftyk vkxjk esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosnd ekSds ij ugha idM+k x;k rFkk /kkjk 3] 4] 5] 6] 7] 8 I.T.P. and 14(2, 3, 4, 5) Foreign Act dk tekur vkosnu i= voj U;k;ky; esa fujLr gksus ds ckn nkSjku foospuk foospd }kjk /kkjk 120 ch Hkk0na0fo0 dh c<+ksRrjh dh x;h gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 8&7&2020 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶8

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds tekur dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶9

i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa] Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 21 ,oa Dataram Singh

¶10

Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 ds izdj.k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr vH;qfDr ds n`f"Vxr] okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa mlh /kujkf’k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶11

1& vkosnd foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku lkf{k;ksa dks Mjk;sxk@/kedk;sxk ugha ,oa vfHk;kstu lk{; ds lkFk NsM+NkM+ ugha djsxkA

¶12

2& vkosnd ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ LFkxu fy, ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxkA

¶13

3& vkosnd tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxk u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxkA

¶14

4& vkosnd dks ;fn ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa ds rgr xfBr lfefr ds vkns’k ds vuqlkj vYidkfyd tekur ij c<+k;k x;k gS rks vYidkfyd tekur dh vof/k lekIr gksus ds ckn mldh tekur izHkkoh gksxhA

¶15

5& vnkyrksa ds lkekU; dkedkt ds cgky gksus rd vkosnd dks fcuk fdlh tekur ds futh eqpyds ij tekur ij c<+k;k tk,xkA vnkyr ds lkekU; dkedkt cgky gksus ds ckn vkjksih ,d eghus ds Hkhrj vnkyr dh larqf"V ds izfrHkqvksa dks izLrqr djsxkA

¶16

6& ikVhZ mPp U;k;ky; bykgkckn dh vkf/kdkfjd osclkbV ls MkmuyksM fd, x, bl rjg ds vkns’k dh daI;wVj tfur izfrfyfi nk;j djsxhA

¶17

7& lacaf/kr U;k;ky;@izkf/kdj.k@vf/kdkjh] mPp U;k;ky; bykgkckn dh vkf/kdkfjd osclkbV ls vkns’k dh ,slh dEI;wVjhd`r izfr dh lR;rk dh iqf"V djsxk vkSj fyf[kr :i ls bl rjg ds lR;kiu dh ?kks"k.k djsxkA

¶18

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ;g tekur jn~n djus dk vk/kkj gksxkA

¶19

fn0 % 10&11&2020 ds0lh0flag

¶20

2 of 2

Rahul Mishra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Mishra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mallu Vs State of U.P.

Momin Vs State of U.P.

Devendra Kumar Shukla @ Chinchu Vs State of U.P.

Chotey Alias Jagdev Prasad Verma Vs State of U.P.

Dilwar Vs State of U.P.

Guru Prasad Tiwari @ Shesh Narayan Tiwari Vs State of U.P.