Allowed

Sonu v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC7 Oct 2020BAIL/30864/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal bail application, the Court granted interim bail imposing strict conditions. The applicant, accused of causing injury, contended lack of prior criminal record and claimed a stay order existed in a related case. The Court relied on Union of India vs. Shiv Shankar Keshari principles regarding fairness in bail proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Interim bail granted with strict conditions, including an undertaking not to flee or tamper with evidence.

Sonu Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 91

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30864 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Sonu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Gaurav Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd lksuw dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 456 lu 2019] vUrxZr /kkjk 21@22 ,u0Mh0ih0,l0 ,sDV] Fkkuk xksfoUnuxj] ftyk eFkqjk esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosnd ds ikl ls n’kkZ;h x;h cjkenxh >wBh o QthZ gS] ?kVuk dk dksbZ Lora= tulk{kh ugha gS] /kkjk 50 ,u0Mh0ih0,l0 ,sDV dk vuqikyu ugha fd;k x;k gS] vkosnd dk dksbZ iwoZ vkijkf/kd bfrgkl ugha gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd bl izdj.k esa lg vfHk;qDr vo/ks’k dh tekur tekur vkosnu i= la0 17612 lu 2020 esa bl U;k;ky; dh vU; U;k;ihB ds vkns’k fn0 219&7&2020 }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 25&11&2019 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶8

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds tekur dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶9

Union of India vs. Shiv Shankar Keshari, (2007) 7 SCC 798 ds izdj.k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 37 ds lanHkZ esa tekur ds fy, vkosnu ij fopkj djrs le; vnkyr dks vfHk;qDr ds nks"kh gksus vFkok mlds xqukgxkj gksus ds rF; ij fopkj ugha fd;k tkrk gSA ;g lhfer mn~ns’; ds fy, vfuok;Z :i ls vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij fjgk djus ds loky ij lhfer gS ftlesa vnkyr dks ;g ns[kuk gksrk gS fd D;k ;g ekuus ds fy, mfpr vk/kkj gSa fd vfHk;qDr nks"kh ugha gS vkSj ,sls vk/kkj ds vfLrRo ds ckjs esa vnkyr viuh larqf"V ntZ djrh gSA ysfdu vnkyr dks bl ekeys ij fopkj ugha djuk gS tSls fd og nks"keqDr gksus dk QSlyk lquk jgh gks vkSj nks"kh ugha gksus dk irk yxk jgh gksA

¶10

ekeys ds rF;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, Union of India vs. Shiv Shankar Keshari, (2007) 7 SCC 798 ds izdj.k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; ds nf"Vxr] Hkkjr ds lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 21 dk cM+k tukns’k] vkjksiksa dh izdfr] leFkZu esa lcwrksa dh izd`fr] ltk dh xaHkhjrk] vkjksih&vkosnd dk pfj=] ifjfLFkfr;kW] eqdnesa esa vfHk;qDr dh mifLFkfr dks lqjf{kr djus dh mfpr laHkkouk] xokgksa ls NsM+NkM+ dh mfpr vk’kadk] turk@jkT; vkSj vU; ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk cM+k fgr] ysfdu xq.k&nks"k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk] esjk ekuuk gS fd ;g tekur nsus ds fy, ,d mi;qDr ekeyk gSA

¶11

rn~uqlkj okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa mlh /kujkf’k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶12

1& vkosnd foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku lkf{k;ksa dks Mjk;sxk@/kedk;sxk ugha ,oa vfHk;kstu lk{; ds lkFk NsM+NkM+ ugha djsxkA

¶13

2& vkosnd ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ LFkxu fy, ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxkA

¶14

3& vkosnd tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxk u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxkA

¶15

4& vkosnd O;fDrxr :i ls ;k vius vf/koDrk ds ek/;e ls U;k;ky; esa fu;r izR;sd frfFk ij fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr jgsxkA mudh vuqifLFkfr ds ekeys esa] i;kZIr dkj.k ds fcuk] fopkj.k U;k;ky; muds f[kykQ Hkk0na0la0 dh /kkjk 229&, ds rgr dk;Zokgh dj ldrh gSA

¶16

5& vkosnd ;fn bl izdj.k esa tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx djrk gS vkSj mldh mifLFkfr lqfuf’pr djus ds fy, mlds fo:) /kkjk 82 na0iz0la0 dh dk;Zokgh tkjh dh tkrh gS vkSj vkosnd bl rjg dh mn~?kks"k.kk esa fu;r dh x;h frfFk ij U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksus esa foQy jgrk gS rks fopkj.k U;k;ky; Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dh /kkjk 174&, ds rgr] dkuwu ds vuqlkj] mlds f[kykQ dk;Zokgh izkjEHk djsxkA

¶17

6& vkosnd ekeys ds izkjEHk gksus dh frfFk ij] vkjksi fojfpr fd, tkus dh frfFk ij ,oa /kkjk 313 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr c;ku gksus ds Lrj ij fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k O;fDrxr :i ls mifLFkr jgsxkA fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ;g ik;k tkrk gS fd vfHk;qDr }kjk bu 'krksZ dk csotg mYya?ku fd;k tk jgk gS rks fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks ;g vf/kdkj gksxk fd og vfHk;qDr }kjk tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ekurs gq, mlds fo:) mfpr dk;Zokgh djsA

¶18

7& vkosnd dks ;fn ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa ds rgr xfBr lfefr ds vkns’k ds vuqlkj vYidkfyd tekur ij c<+k;k x;k gS rks vYidkfyd tekur dh vof/k lekIr gksus ds ckn mldh tekur izHkkoh gksxhA

¶19

8& vnkyrksa ds lkekU; dkedkt ds cgky gksus rd vkosnd dks fcuk fdlh tekur ds futh eqpyds ij tekur ij c<+k;k tk,xkA vnkyr ds lkekU; dkedkt cgky gksus ds ckn vkjksih ,d eghus ds Hkhrj vnkyr dh larqf"V ds izfrHkqvksa dks izLrqr djsxkA

¶20

9& ikVhZ mPp U;k;ky; bykgkckn dh vkf/kdkfjd osclkbV ls MkmuyksM fd, x, bl rjg ds vkns’k dh daI;wVj tfur izfrfyfi nk;j djsxhA

¶21

10& lacaf/kr U;k;ky;@izkf/kdj.k@vf/kdkjh] mPp U;k;ky; bykgkckn dh vkf/kdkfjd osclkbV ls vkns’k dh ,slh dEI;wVjhd`r izfr dh lR;rk dh iqf"V djsxk vkSj fyf[kr :i ls bl rjg ds lR;kiu dh ?kks"k.k djsxkA

¶22

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ;g tekur jn~n djus dk vk/kkj

¶23

gksxkA

¶24

fn0 % 07&10&2020 ds0lh0flag

¶25

2 of 2

Sonu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunder Vs State of U.P.

Sonu Vs State of U.P.

Farukh Vs State of U.P.

Rashid Vs State of U.P.

Mohd Kaseem Vs State of U.P.

Kaseem Vs State of U.P.