Shahid v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court released applicant Shahid on bail in proceedings under Sections 395, 120-B, and 412 IPC, imposing specific conditions and grounding the order on parity with a co-accused who had already been granted bail.
What did the court decide?
Release on bail with a personal bond and two sureties, subject to the court verifying authenticity via official website download.
What the court decided
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28767 of 2020
Applicant :- Shahid Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Pati Tiwari,Vijay Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vijai Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard Sri Vijay Pratap Singh, counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State.
Supplementary affidavit filed explaining criminal history of 13 cases of the applicant is taken on record.
This bail application has been preferred by the accusedapplicant, Shahid , who is involved in Case Crime No. 111 of 2019, under Sections- 395, 120-B and 412 I.P.C., Police Station- Jarcha, District- Gautam Budh Nagar.
Co-accused, Kuldeep @ Bittu @ Vintu, has already been granted bail vide order dated 27.2.2020 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 7775 of 2020. The case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is languishing in jail since 01.06.2019. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Let applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions-
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shahid
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/28767/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court