Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary J. reviewed the provisions of the U.P. Gangsters Act regarding bail relaxations. Considering that the applicant is a functionary and an employee of the State, the court further relaxed the bail conditions instead of granting bail to prevent intimidation.
Bail conditions were further relaxed instead of granting bail to the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28655 of 2020
Applicant :- Bilal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Arshi Abdy,Syed Mohammad Abbas Abdy Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd fcyky dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 357 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 2@3 U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986, Fkkuk xqykoBh] ftyk cqyUn’kgj esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa jaft’ku >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosnd ds fo:) xSax pkVZ esa nf’kZr oknksa esa mldh tekur Lohd`r gks pqdh gS bldk Li"Vhdj.k 'kiFki= esa fn;k x;k gS] vkosnd fdlh xSax dk yhMj ;k lnL; ugha gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 27&07&2020 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;] tekur ij eqDr gksus ds i’pkr~ vkosnd Qjkj ugha gksxk vkSj u gh vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa dks izHkkfor djsxkA
fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds tekur dk fojks/k fd;kA
i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa] Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 21 ,oa Dataram Singh
Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 ds izdj.k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr vH;qfDr ds n`f"Vxr] okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa mlh /kujkf’k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A
7& lacaf/kr U;k;ky;@izkf/kdj.k@vf/kdkjh] mPp U;k;ky; bykgkckn dh vkf/kdkfjd osclkbV ls vkns’k dh ,slh dEI;wVjhd`r izfr dh lR;rk dh iqf"V djsxk vkSj fyf[kr :i ls bl rjg ds lR;kiu dh ?kks"k.k djsxkA
mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ;g tekur jn~n djus dk vk/kkj
gksxkA
fn0 % 06&10&2020 ds0lh0flag
2 of 2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail conditions under the U.P. Gangsters Act relaxations can be solicited in a bail application.
Whether the applicant should be released on bail deposit of Rs 20000/-.
Further whether the applicant should be released on bail.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P.Relied on¶9
Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, (2018) 3 SCC 22 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bilal
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
