Allowed

Nitin Rajpoot v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC17 Sept 2020BAIL/27741/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge granted bail to the applicant, Nitin Rajpoot, who was charged under Sections 452, 307, 504, and 506 IPC. The court relied on a larger mandate of Article 21 and the dictum in Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. The applicant, who had been in jail since June 5, 2020, was ordered to execute a personal bond and sureties with conditions to attend trial and not tamper with witnesses. The ord

What did the court decide?

Released on bail via personal bond and two sureties with conditions to attend trial and not tamper with witnesses.

Nitin Rajpoot Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 76

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 27741 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Nitin Rajpoot Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Priyanka Devi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

¶6

The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to malafide intention. He is innocent and has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that as per medical report of the victim all the injuries found on the body of the victim are simple in nature. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. The applicant is languishing in jail since 05.06.2020. He undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted, therefore, he may be released on bail.

¶7

Learned AGA vehemently opposed the prayer.

¶8

Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing

¶9

any view on the merits of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.

¶10

Let the applicant- Nitin Rajpoot involved in Case Crime No. 21 of 2020, under Sections 452, 307, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Sirsakalar, District Jalaun be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:

¶11

The applicant will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶12

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶13

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶14

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶15

It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.

¶16

The party is permitted to file a computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of Allahabad High Court before the court concerned, who shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of Allahabad High Court.

¶17

Order Date :- 17.9.2020 Arti

Nitin Rajpoot v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nitin Rajpoot v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satya Prakash Singh @ Rinku Singh Vs State of U.P.

Kamlesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Nitin Kumar Sharma Vs State of U.P. and Another

Natthu Vs State of U.P.

Khushbu Alias Mohit Vs State of U.P.

Farman Vs State of U.P.