Single Judge applied Section 263 of the Explosive Substances Act and Article 21 of the Constitution, relying on Dataram Singh to grant enhanced bail to the applicant who was already on bail.
Enhanced bail granted to the applicant under Section 263 of the Explosive Substances Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26866 of 2020
Applicant :- Sujeet Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd lqthr ;kno dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 0263 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 4@5 Explosive Substance Act, Fkkuk djNuk] ftyk iz;kxjkt esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,o a fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa jaft’ku >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosnd ds ikl ls ce] reapk o dkjrwl vkfn cjken ugha gq, gSa] iqfyl }kjk QthZ cjkenxh fn[kk;h x;h gS] ?kVukLFky dk dksbZ Lora= tulk{kh ugha gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 22&6&2020 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;] tekur ij eqDr gksus ds i’pkr~ vkosnd Qjkj ugha gksxk vkSj u gh vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa dks izHkkfor djsxkA
fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds tekur dk fojks/k fd;kA
i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa] Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 21 ,oa Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 ds izdj.k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr vH;qfDr ds n`f"Vxr] okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa mlh /kujkf’k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A
1& vkosnd foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku lkf{k;ksa dks Mjk;sxk@/kedk;sxk ugha ,oa vfHk;kstu lk{; ds lkFk NsM+NkM+ ugha djsxkA
7& lacaf/kr U;k;ky;@izkf/kdj.k@vf/kdkjh] mPp U;k;ky; bykgkckn dh vkf/kdkfjd osclkbV ls vkns’k dh ,slh dEI;wVjhd`r izfr dh lR;rk dh iqf"V djsxk vkSj fyf[kr :i ls bl rjg ds lR;kiu dh ?kks"k.k djsxkA
mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ;g tekur jn~n djus dk vk/kkj gksxkA
fn0 % 7&12&2020 ds0lh0flag
2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail order made under the Explosive Substances Act requires enhancement of bail if a special judge later orders registration of FIR.
Whether the allegation that the applicant failed to disclose relevant material facts vitil the anticipatory bail order granted vide order dated 22.6.2020.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and anotherRelied on¶9
Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, (2018) 3 SCC 22 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sujeet Yadav
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Gautam Chowdhary
Parties & counsel
