Allowed

Sanjai Jat v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC18 Sept 2020BAIL/25155/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed bail application of Sanjai Jat in a case under U.P. Gangsters Act. Bail granted on personal bond with conditions, excluding sureties until normal court functioning is restored, referencing Article 21 and Dataram Singh.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail upon furnishing personal bond and two sureties post-restoration of normal court functioning, subject to specified conditions.

Sanjai Jat Vs State of U.P. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 70

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25155 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Sanjai Jat Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mahabir Yadav,Mahesh Kumar Kuntal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

¶6

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant Sanjai Jat, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 1 of 2019, under Sections 2/3 U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities(Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Refinery, District- Mathura, during pendency of trial.

¶7

There are four cases shown against the applicant in the gang chart.The bail orders of three cases were filed alongwith bail application and bail order of fourth case has been filed alongwith supplementary affidavit, which is taken on record. The applicant alleges false implication in the present case due to police rivalry. He is languishing in jail since 13.10.2018.

¶8

Having considered the material on record, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶9

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶10

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶11

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶12

In case the applicant has been enlarged on short term bail as per the order of committee constituted under the orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court his bail shall be effective after the period of short term bail comes to an end.

¶13

The applicant shall be enlarged on bail on execution of personal bond without sureties till normal functioning of the courts is restored. The accused will furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the court below within a month after normal functioning of the courts are restored.In case court below is functioning normally, this condition will not apply and applicant shall be enlarged on bail on execution of bail bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court below.

¶14

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶15

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶16

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶17

Order Date :- 18.9.2020 Atul kr. sri.

Sanjai Jat v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjai Jat v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Vivek Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Raju @ Rajesh Vs State of U.P.

Nekpal Vs State of U.P.

Bilal and Another Vs State of U.P.

Diwan Singh @ Chhotu Vs State of U.P.