Dismissed
Deepak Rawat v. State of Up
Allahabad HCBAIL/23540/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bail application rejected as infructuous because the applicant had already been convicted by the trial court. No substantive legal principles laid down.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
In Chamber
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23540 of 2018
¶3
Applicant :- Deepak Rawat Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
¶4
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
¶5
- Heard Sri Ajay Dubey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ghanshyam Kumar, learned AGA for the State through video conferencing.
¶6
- Learned counsel for the applicant states that, according to his instructions, the present application has become infructuous as the applicant has already been convicted.
¶7
- Accordingly, the present application is rejected as infructuous.
¶8
Order Date :- 3.6.2020 Prakhar
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Deepak Rawat
Coram
AI extract
Saumitra Dayal Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/23540/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court