Dismissed

Suman v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC2 Nov 2020BAIL/22213/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal bail application rejected in a murder case where trial was imminent. The accused was named in the FIR and dying declaration as the perpetrator. The High Court directed the trial court to conclude trial within three months after post-pandemic resumption.

What did the court decide?

Bail application rejected. Trial court directed to conclude trial within three months of resuming normal functioning post-pandemic.

Suman Vs State of U.P. — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 76

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22213 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Suman Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Narendra Kumar Singh,Raj Bahadur Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rajeev Kumar Singh Parmar

¶4

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

¶5

Let the counter affidavit filed today in Court be taken on record.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the entire record.

¶7

The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No. 233 of 2018 under Section 302 IPC, Police Station Rajepur, District Farrukhabad with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.

¶8

From perusal of the First Information Report of this incident, it reveals that the accused applicant was specifically named in the First Information Report and the accused applicant was attributed the role of throwing petrol over the deceased. The deceased has given a dying declaration in which he has specifically mentioned the name of the present accused Suman.

¶9

The Court has been apprised by the learned counsel for both the parties that trial of this case is about to conclude. In this scenario of the case, this Court is not oblige to grant bail to the accused applicant. Hence, the bail application is rejected.

¶10

However, it is directed that the Trial Court will conclude the trial within three months from the date it resumes its normal functioning after getting rid of the fear of community transmission of Covid19 pandemic.

¶11

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of

¶12

High Court Allahabad, self attested by the learned counsel for the applicant along with a self attested identity proof of the said persons (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number (s) to which the said Aadhar Card is linked before the concerned Court/Authority/Official.

¶13

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶14

Order Date :- 2.11.2020 LBY

Suman v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suman v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harjeet @ Arjeet Vs State of U.P. and Another

Jai Prakash Vs State of U.P.

Mohd. Mansoor Alam @ Mannu Vs State of U.P.

Naresh Pal Vs State of U.P.

Chhangur Vs State of U.P.

Subhankar Mondal Vs State of U.P.