Dismissed
Dinesh Bharti v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/16972/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bail application held infructuous due to the passage of time as no one appeared to press it; application dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 34
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16972 of 2017
¶3
Applicant :- Dinesh Bharti Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Prakash Dwivedi,Ashfaq Ahmed Ansari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shams Vikas
¶4
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
¶5
- This is a bail application pending since 2017. Called in revise. None appeared to press it. Learned A.G.A. is present for State. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
¶6
- It appears that either trial has concluded or applicant has lost interest for any other reason and that's why none is present to press it. Therefore, by efflux of time, this application has rendered infructuous.
¶7
- Dismissed accordingly.
¶8
Order Date :- 26.2.2020 KA
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Dinesh Bharti
Coram
AI extract
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/16972/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court