Allowed

Suresh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC3 Jun 2020BAIL/13034/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court in Chamber allowed bail in a criminal case under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, and 471 IPC. Granting bail on the ground of parity with a co-accused already released and invoking Article 21 and Dataram Singh. The applicant was released on a personal bond with two sureties subject to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; applicant released on bail subject to a personal bond and two sureties with specific conditions regarding trial conduct and court restoration.

Suresh Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

In Chamber

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13034 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Suresh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anshul Kumar Gupta,Indra Jit Singh,Om Prakash Singh (Senior Adv.) Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

In view of the guidelines laid down by this Court, the urgent bail applications have been directed to be heard through Video Conferencing.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Vikas Sahai, learned AGA through Video Conferencing.

¶7

Order on Criminal Misc. Exemption Application

¶8

This exemption application is allowed.

¶9

Order on Criminal Misc. Bail Application

¶10

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Suresh, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 0032 of 2020, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Charwa, District- Kaushambi during pendency of trial.

¶11

The co-accused, Beerendra Singh, has been enlarged on bail in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.12312 of 2020. The prayer for release of the applicant on bail on the ground of parity has been made. The applicant is languishing in jail since 26.02.2020.

¶12

Considering the fact that the identically placed coaccused has already been released on bail by this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that it is a fit case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶13

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.

¶14

Having considered the material on record, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶15

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶16

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶17

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶18

In case the applicant has been enlarged on short term bail as per the order of committee constituted under the orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court his bail shall be effective after the period of short term bail comes to an end.

¶19

The applicant shall be enlarged on bail on execution of personal bond without sureties till normal functioning of the courts is restored. The accused will furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the court below within a month after normal functioning of the courts are restored.

¶20

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶21

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶22

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶23

Order Date :- 3.6.2020 SS

¶24

Digitally signed by JUSTICE SIDDHARTH Date: 2020.06.03 15:45:37 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Suresh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumit Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Naushad Ahmad Vs State of U.P. and Another

Kunwar Lal Vs State of U.P. and Another

Balveer Singh Vs State of U.P.and Another

Sahansar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Aakash Dubey and 2 Others Vs State of U.P.