Rahul v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail allowed — Sections 394, 411 I.P.C — Case Crime No. 304 of 2019 (Case No. 1221 of 2019), Police Station Kotwali, District Ghaziabad — applicant not named in FIR against four unknown persons — recovery of looted amount from all accused — parity with co-accused Gaurav @ Gauri, Sundar @ Surrendra, Mohit enlarged on bail (orders dated 27.11.2019 and 21.10.2019 in Bail Application Nos. 25960 and 28677 of 2019) — alleged false implication without identification parade — criminal history of three cases explained — in jail since 28.4.2019 — novel corona virus in jails — Article 21 Constitution of India — Dataram Singh v. State of U.P., (2018) 3 SCC 22 relied on — personal bond and two sureties, conditions imposed — CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 12552 of 2020 — High Court Allahabad — Siddharth, J. — order date 6.8.2020.
What did the court decide?
Bail granted to applicant Rahul in Case Crime No. 304 of 2019 (Case No. 1221 of 2019) under Sections 394, 411 IPC, Police Station Kotwali, District Ghaziabad, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to seven conditions including non-tampering with evidence, cooperation in trial without adjournments, no criminal activity, and furnishing of sureties within a month after normal functioning of courts is restored (release on personal bond without sureties till then); breach of conditions to be a ground for cancellation of bail.