Allowed

Anis v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC3 Sept 2020BAIL/12134/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court granted bail to the applicant in a criminal case involving theft and cheating. Bail was allowed upon executing a personal bond and sureties with specific conditions, including a requirement to verify the order digitally once courts resume normal functioning.

What did the court decide?

Allowed the bail application. Applicant released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in like amount subject to conditions.

Anis Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 70

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12134 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Anis Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kuamr Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

¶6

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Anis, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 65 of 2020, under Sections 411, 414, 420, 482 IPC, Police Station Garhmukteshwar, District- Hapur during pendency of trial.

¶7

Allegation in the first information report is that recovery of stolen vehicles have been made from the applicant.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that five vehicles have been recovered from joint possession of three accused persons including the applicant. It has been submitted that the accuseds were involved in the different cases and recovery has been shown from joint possession of the applicants. Vehicles shown were standing in the police station itself. The applicant is in jail since 10.02.2020 and had no prior criminal history.

¶9

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.

¶10

Having considered the material on record, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶11

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶12

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶13

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶14

In case the applicant has been enlarged on short term bail as per the order of committee constituted under the orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court his bail shall be effective after the period of short term bail comes to an end.

¶15

The applicant shall be enlarged on bail on execution of personal bond without sureties till normal functioning of the courts is restored. The accused will furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the court below within a month after normal functioning of the courts are restored.

¶16

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶17

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶19

Order Date :- 3.9.2020 SS

Anis v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anis v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Avinash Vs State of U.P.

Padam Singh Vs State of U.P.

Dharmendra Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Kalbe Haider Vs State of U.P.

Vishnu Kant Dwivedi Vs State of U.P.

Ashiq Ali Rayani Vs State of U.P.