This court dismissed a fourth listing order regarding an anticipatory bail application due to the absence of counsel, recording it as dismissed for want of prosecution.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5359 of 2020
Applicant :- Ubaid And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Radhey Shyam Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Raj Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
This is the fourth listing of the application. No one has turned up in the revised list.
The applicant is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 10.12.2020 Rohit
Ubaid And 4 Others
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
