Arvind and 6 Ors. v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
This court rejected an anticipatory bail application filed by Arvind and six others in a case involving affray and attempted murder, declining to find good grounds for bail and vacating an earlier interim order.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed; interim bail vacated; liberty granted to approach regular bail under S. 439 Cr.P.C.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3704 of 2020
Applicant :- Arvind And 6 Ors Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J.
Heard Sri S.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Gaurav Pratap Singh, learned Brief Holder for the State and perused the record.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that coaccused Dharampal has already been granted anticipatory bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.6.2020 passed in Crl. Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2973 of 2020 copy of which is annexed at page-54 of the present bail application. He submits that there are cross reports of the incident in which both sides have received injuries and so far as the injuries received by the injured from the side of prosecution are concerned, the same are simple in nature. He submits that earlier on 6.7.2020 interim bail was granted to the applicants by Coordinate Bench of this Court, hence anticipatory bail may be granted to the applicant.
Learned Brief Holder for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that there are nine injured person, who received injuries on their person and the participation of the applicants in the incident in question cannot be ruled out as they have been assigned the role of causing injuries to the injured by hard and blunt object.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicants in a case involving affray and attempted murder.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Arvind And 6 Ors
Coram
Ramesh Sinha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/3704/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court