Allowed

Satendra Singh @ Satendra @ Satto v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC22 Sept 2020ABAIL/2561/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge granted anticipatory bail to the applicant under Section 438 Cr.P.C. without expressing an opinion on the merits, releasing him on bail conditions until the submission of a police report, while directing expedited investigation.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties each, subject to surrender for interrogation and other standard conditions until police report submission

Satendra Singh @ Satendra @ Satto Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 1

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2561 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Satendra Singh @ Satendra @ Satto Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ravitendra Pratap Singh Chandel,Azhar Hussain Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Ravitendra Pratap Singh Chandel, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Gaurav Pratap Singh, learned Brief Holder appearing for the State and perused the record.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and the injury sustained by the injured are simple in nature and moreover applicant has been granted interim protection in the present anticipatory bail application by this Court vide order dated 10.6.2020, which has been extended on 27.7.2020. The present FIR has been lodged against the applicant just for harassment. The applicant has no criminal antecedents.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the nature of accusation and granting interim protection, the applicant is entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in this case.

¶9

In the event of arrest of the applicant Satendra Singh @ Satendra @ Satto , involved in Case Crime No. 403 of 2019, under sections 352, 353, 307, 506 and 34 IPC, P.S. Achhnera, District AGara, he shall be released on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report, if any, under section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. before the competent Court on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-

¶10

(i) the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶11

(ii) the applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to

¶12

the Court or to any police officer;

¶13

(iii) the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. /Competent Court concerned.

¶14

In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶15

The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudice by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant.

¶16

The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P/S.P./Competent Court concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.

¶17

It is made clear that if there is any criminal history of the applicant beside the present case, the order granting anticipatory bail to applicant shall automatically stands discharged.

¶18

The party shall file computer generated copy of order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by it alongwith a self attested identity proof of the said person(s) (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number(s) to which the said Aadhar Card is linked, before the concerned Court/Authority/Official.

¶19

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of the computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶20

Order Date :- 22.9.2020 Tamang

Satendra Singh @ Satendra @ Satto v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satendra Singh @ Satendra @ Satto v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Prasad Vs State of U.P.

Vikash Upadhyay Vs State of U.P.

Mustakeem Vs State of U.P.

Ajay Singh Patel Vs State of U.P.

Devendra Kumar Dubey and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Yasar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others